From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bean v. Pearson Education, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
May 2, 2011
CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR (D. Ariz. May. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR.

May 2, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (Doc. 35.) On March 22, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Case. (Doc. 26.) On April 18, 2011, Plaintiffs having failed to respond to the motion, Defendant filed a Notice of Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Doc. 34.) In the present motion, filed April 19, Plaintiffs acknowledge that due to a "calendaring mistake" they failed to file a timely response to Defendant's motion to dismiss. (Doc. 35 at 3.) On April 28, Defendant filed a notice of non-opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for an extension. (Doc. 36.)

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Doc. 35). The response Plaintiffs filed on April 19, 2011 (Doc. 35, Ex. A), is deemed filed as of that date.


Summaries of

Bean v. Pearson Education, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Arizona
May 2, 2011
CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR (D. Ariz. May. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Bean v. Pearson Education, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Tom Bean, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Pearson Education, Inc., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: May 2, 2011

Citations

CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR (D. Ariz. May. 2, 2011)