From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beam v. Paterson Safe Deposit Trust Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 427 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Argued October term, 1925.

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 96 N.J. Eq. 141.

Mr. William B. Beam, for the appellants.

Messrs. Griggs Harding, for the respondent.


The decree in this case will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by the vice-chancellor. We, however, express no opinion upon the meritorious questions argued, for the reason that they are involved in the appeal now pending in the prerogative court. Should that appeal be adversely decided to the appellants here, an appeal is open to this court for the purpose of review upon the question indicated. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Beam v. Paterson Safe Deposit Trust Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 427 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Beam v. Paterson Safe Deposit Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD BEAM et al., appellants, v. PATERSON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 427 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Van Buren v. Plainfield Trust Co.

The executor and trustee contends that the decree of the Union County Orphans Court so entered on the account…

Melosh v. Melosh

Section 127 of the Orphans Court act ( R.S. 3:10-18) provides that the decree of the orphans court on the…