From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bd. of Trs. of Teamsters Miscellaneous Sec. Tr. Fund v. Opus Noeline, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 10, 2022
2:21-cv-09854-DSF-JEM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-09854-DSF-JEM

02-10-2022

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS MISCELLANEOUS SECURITY TRUST FUND Plaintiffs, v. OPUS NOELINE, INC. Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Dale S. Fischer, United States District Judge.

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In this case, Opus Noeline, Inc. failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before February 24, 2022 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bd. of Trs. of Teamsters Miscellaneous Sec. Tr. Fund v. Opus Noeline, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 10, 2022
2:21-cv-09854-DSF-JEM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Bd. of Trs. of Teamsters Miscellaneous Sec. Tr. Fund v. Opus Noeline, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TEAMSTERS MISCELLANEOUS SECURITY TRUST FUND…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 10, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-09854-DSF-JEM (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2022)