From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayramoglu v. Ochoa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2012
CASE NO. ED CV 11-678-PSG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. ED CV 11-678-PSG (PJW)

03-28-2012

FIKRI BAYRAMOGLU, Petitioner, v. J. TIM OCHOA, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

____________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bayramoglu v. Ochoa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2012
CASE NO. ED CV 11-678-PSG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Bayramoglu v. Ochoa

Case Details

Full title:FIKRI BAYRAMOGLU, Petitioner, v. J. TIM OCHOA, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 28, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. ED CV 11-678-PSG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2012)

Citing Cases

Nichols v. Arnold

Due process required nothing more. Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. at 220-22; see also Roberts v. Hartley, 640…