From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bayard v. Willis

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 28, 1978
246 S.E.2d 315 (Ga. 1978)

Opinion

33552.

SUBMITTED MAY 5, 1978.

DECIDED JUNE 28, 1978.

Habeas corpus; custody of child. Columbia Superior Court. Before Judge Hardin.

Surrett, Thompson, Bell, Choate Walker, J. Samuel Choate, Jr., for appellant.

Fleming, Blanchard Thompson, James G. Blanchard, Jr., for appellee.


This is a dispute over the custody of the parties' fourteen-year-old minor child. The superior court denied the nonresident custodial parent's habeas corpus petition brought to enforce a 1974 Florida divorce decree awarding child custody to the mother. We reverse.

The mother is a resident of Florida. When the parties were divorced she was awarded child custody. The father paid his 14-year-old son's air fare to Georgia and would not release the boy to the mother. She brought habeas corpus.

As a matter of public policy to deter child snatching, a nonresident custodial parent should not be forced to relitigate questions of custody in the noncustodial parent's jurisdiction. Matthews v. Matthews, 238 Ga. 201 ( 232 S.E.2d 76) (1977); Woods v. Woods, 238 Ga. 737 ( 235 S.E.2d 36) (1977); Meek v. Baillargeon, 239 Ga. 137 ( 236 S.E.2d 81) (1977).

The father urges that because the child now is with him in this state and Georgia law permits a fourteen-year-old basically to elect with which parent the child desires to live (see Code Ann. §§ 30-127, 74-107), the Georgia court was authorized to reconsider the issue of custody. The fact that the child is now fourteen and residing in Georgia with the noncustodial parent does not authorize the Georgia court to relitigate the issue of legal custody. The father is not without legal recourse; the court where the custodial parent resides has the right to award a change in custody. Matthews v. Matthews, supra; German v. Johnson, 231 Ga. 454 (2) ( 202 S.E.2d 89) (1973).

Where a nonresident parent who has been awarded custody of a child by court order enters this state to regain that child from the noncustodial parent and files a habeas corpus petition, the trial court may not reconsider the question of legal custody. The trial court erred in failing to grant the mother's petition since she is the legal custodian of the child. Meek v. Baillargeon, supra; Moore v. Moore, 240 Ga. 751, 752 ( 242 S.E.2d 68) (1978).

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.


SUBMITTED MAY 5, 1978 — DECIDED JUNE 28, 1978.


Summaries of

Bayard v. Willis

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jun 28, 1978
246 S.E.2d 315 (Ga. 1978)
Case details for

Bayard v. Willis

Case Details

Full title:BAYARD v. WILLIS

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jun 28, 1978

Citations

246 S.E.2d 315 (Ga. 1978)
246 S.E.2d 315

Citing Cases

Canning v. Evans

This policy has been reiterated many times since Matthews, supra. See Woods v. Woods, 238 Ga. 737 ( 235…

Reid v. Adams

A nonresident legal custodian should not be forced to relitigate questions of custody in the jurisdiction…