From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bay Ridge Community Council, Inc. v. Carey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 657 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1985

Decided October 10, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Gerald Adler, J.

Dennis C. McMahon for appellant.

Richard S. Scolaro for Clarence P. Rappleyea, intervenor-appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Richard G. Liskov and Robert Hermann of counsel), respondent pro se, and for Hugh L. Carey and others, respondents. C. Daniel Chill, Kenneth Shapiro and Theodore Dickson for Stanley Fink and another, respondents.


Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division ( 103 A.D.2d 280).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.


Summaries of

Bay Ridge Community Council, Inc. v. Carey

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 657 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Bay Ridge Community Council, Inc. v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:BAY RIDGE COMMUNITY COUNCIL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HUGH L. CAREY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 10, 1985

Citations

66 N.Y.2d 657 (N.Y. 1985)
495 N.Y.S.2d 972
486 N.E.2d 830

Citing Cases

Our City Action Buffalo, Inc. v. Common Council of City of the Buffalo

Buffalo's redistricting maps must comply with substantive criteria imposed by two sources: MHRL §…

Matter of Wolpoff v. Cuomo

In the final analysis, the guiding principle continues to be the prescriptions contained in the State…