From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxter v. No Defendant Named

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00631-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00631-BNB

04-23-2012

DAVID BAXTER, Plaintiff, v. [NO DEFENDANT NAMED] Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, David Baxter, initiated this action by filing pro se a document, which has been designated as a complaint, that appears to include allegations that his civil rights are being violated at the prison in which he is confined. On March 14, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing Mr. Baxter to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue his claims. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland ordered Mr. Baxter to file a Prisoner Complaint and either to pay the $350.00 filing fee or to file a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 along with a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement in support of the 28 U.S.C. § 1915 motion. Mr. Baxter was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days.

Mr. Baxter has failed to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed and failed to respond in any way to Magistrate Judge Boland's March 14 order. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Baxter failed to cure the deficiencies as directed. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 23rd day of April , 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Baxter v. No Defendant Named

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00631-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Baxter v. No Defendant Named

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BAXTER, Plaintiff, v. [NO DEFENDANT NAMED] Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00631-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)