From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 11, 2008
No. C 07-1359 PJH (JL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 07-1359 PJH (JL).

December 11, 2008


ORDER


This Court received the parties' Joint Statement Regarding Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of Patent Prosecution Files Listed on Plaintiffs' Privilege Logs (Docket # 216). The Court reviewed the statement and finds the motion unsuitable for submission on a joint statement. The matter should be briefed in a formal noticed motion. In any such motion, the parties shall address the issue of choice of law and their pleadings shall include copies of all relevant privilege log entries and documentation of the parties' efforts to meet and confer as required by this Court's Standing Order. Plaintiffs shall produce to the Court Document # 23 of Baxter's Privilege Log, the parties' joint defense agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 11, 2008
No. C 07-1359 PJH (JL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Fresenius Medical Care Holding, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Baxter Healthcare Corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Fresenius Medical…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Dec 11, 2008

Citations

No. C 07-1359 PJH (JL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

U.S. Inspection Services, Inc. v. NL Engineered Solutions, LLC

The burden is on the party seeking to withhold documents under the work product doctrine to show that it…

In re EHR Aviation, Inc.

The party asserting the work product doctrine has the burden of establishing its application to each…