From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bax v. Clark

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2021
1:20-cv-222 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-222

06-24-2021

TEVIN BAX, Plaintiff v. MATTHEW DWAYNE CLARK, Defendant


ORDER

Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge

AND NOW, on this 24th day of June 2021, in accordance with the Memorandum accompanying this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The DOC's motion to quash (Doc. No. 60) is DENIED, and Plaintiff's cross-motion to compel compliance (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED;

2. Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, the DOC is directed to provide copies of Plaintiff's psychological file and Defendant Clark's personnel file, including any documents regarding any other alleged assaults committed by him, to counsel for Plaintiff, subject to any confidentiality agreement the parties may find it necessary to enter into; and

3. Plaintiff will be required to pay the costs incurred by the DOC in complying with the subpoena duces tecum.


Summaries of

Bax v. Clark

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2021
1:20-cv-222 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Bax v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:TEVIN BAX, Plaintiff v. MATTHEW DWAYNE CLARK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-222 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 24, 2021)