From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baum v. Crosfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1952
280 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

November 17, 1952.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See ante, p. 805.]


Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Baum v. Crosfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 17, 1952
280 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Baum v. Crosfield

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE BAUM, Respondent, v. HADASSA CROSFIELD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 17, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)