From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baum v. Crosfield

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1952
108 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

Submitted October 6, 1952

Decided October 9, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, DUGAN, J.

Armende Lesser for motion.

Herbert G. Bantz opposed.


Motion dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 589, subd. 1, cl. [b].)


Summaries of

Baum v. Crosfield

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 9, 1952
108 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Baum v. Crosfield

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE BAUM, Respondent, v. HADASSA CROSFIELD, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 9, 1952

Citations

108 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1952)
304 N.Y. 732