From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baughman v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 8, 2013
2012-7183 (Fed. Cir. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

2012-7183

05-08-2013

WILLIAM D. BAUGHMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 11-137, Judge William A. Moorman.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The court construes William D. Baughman's submission of payment to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims as a motion to reinstate his appeal.

This appeal was dismissed on January 25, 2013 for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules because Mr. Baughman has not paid the fee. Mr. Baughman has now submitted payment of the fee to the Veterans Court.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Court of Veterans Claims is directed to accept payment.

(2) The motion to reinstate is granted. The mandate is recalled, and the court's dismissal order is vacated.

(3) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs should calculate the due date for the filing of his brief from the date of this order.

FOR THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s19


Summaries of

Baughman v. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 8, 2013
2012-7183 (Fed. Cir. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Baughman v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. BAUGHMAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

2012-7183 (Fed. Cir. May. 8, 2013)