From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baughman v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
No. 5:13-CV-143-FL (E.D.N.C. Jul. 8, 2014)

Summary

ruling that the ALJ failed to "'provide sufficient articulation for his reasons for [dismissing the Medicaid decision] so to allow for a meaningful review by the courts'"

Summary of this case from Taylor v. Colvin

Opinion

No. 5:13-CV-143-FL

07-08-2014

GREGORY BAUGHMAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr., regarding the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. No objections to the M&R have been filed, and the time within which to make any objection has expired. This matter is ripe for ruling.

Upon careful review of the M&R and of the record generally, having found no clear error, the court hereby ADOPTS the recommendation of the magistrate judge as its own, and, for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, defendant's motion is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED to defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the M&R. The clerk of court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED this the 8th day of July, 2014.

/s/_________

LOUISE W. FLANAGAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Baughman v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Jul 8, 2014
No. 5:13-CV-143-FL (E.D.N.C. Jul. 8, 2014)

ruling that the ALJ failed to "'provide sufficient articulation for his reasons for [dismissing the Medicaid decision] so to allow for a meaningful review by the courts'"

Summary of this case from Taylor v. Colvin

adopting memorandum and recommendation

Summary of this case from Adams v. Colvin

remanding case for failure to explain consideration given to Medicaid decision, where "[a]pplying the same regulations governing SSA determinations, the NCDHHS determined that Claimant was limited to performing sedentary work, which resulted in a directed finding of disabled"

Summary of this case from Barroso v. Berryhill

remanding case for failure to explain consideration given to Medicaid decision, where "[a]pplying the same regulations governing SSA determinations, the NCDHHS determined that Claimant was limited to performing sedentary work, which resulted in a directed finding of disabled"

Summary of this case from Perry v. Berryhill

remanding case for failure to explain consideration given to Medicaid decision, where "[a]pplying the same regulations governing SSA determinations, the NCDHHS determined that Claimant was limited to performing sedentary work, which resulted in a directed finding of disabled"

Summary of this case from Chriscoe v. Colvin
Case details for

Baughman v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY BAUGHMAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 8, 2014

Citations

No. 5:13-CV-143-FL (E.D.N.C. Jul. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Berryhill

In further support, plaintiff cites a series of cases from the Eastern District of North Carolina, which tend…

Trammell v. Berryhill

noting that both the Medicaid and VA disability programs share markedly similar standards and requirements…