From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Batts v. State, Dept. of Educ

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 9, 1994
631 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-1476.

February 9, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Patti Englander Henning, J.

Stephen J. Finta, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Steven B. Sprechman, North Miami Beach, for appellee.


The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the circuit court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Because this controversy involved four separate promissory notes, each for $2,500, the notes could not be aggregated to meet the then-existing $5,000 jurisdictional requirement and confer jurisdiction on the circuit court. Accordingly, we reverse. See Burkhart v. Gowin, 86 Fla. 376, 98 So. 140 (1923); Canonico v. Devine, 130 So.2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). This cause is remanded with directions to vacate the final judgment and to transfer this cause to the county court pursuant to rule 1.060(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

HERSEY, FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Batts v. State, Dept. of Educ

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 9, 1994
631 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Batts v. State, Dept. of Educ

Case Details

Full title:NORLIZA BATTS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 9, 1994

Citations

631 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Grunewald v. Warren

If it clearly appeared of record that the value of the inventory which the Grunewalds would have recovered as…

Ben-David v. Edu. Res. Ins

[S]eparate, unrelated, distinct, and wholly independent demands, as promissory notes given for wholly…