From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Battle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 19, 2006
929 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

reaffirming the holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, that "[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt."

Summary of this case from Battle v. McDonough

Opinion

Case No. 2D06-325.

Opinion filed April 19, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Ronald N. Ficarrotta, Judge.


Affirmed. See Long v. State, 529 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1988);Tillman v. State, 900 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Riser v. State, 898 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Carpenter v. State, 884 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Caraballo v. State, 805 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Mills v. State, 840 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

SALCINES, STRINGER, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.


Summaries of

Battle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 19, 2006
929 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

reaffirming the holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, that "[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt."

Summary of this case from Battle v. McDonough
Case details for

Battle v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE BATTLE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 19, 2006

Citations

929 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Battle v. McDonough

The mandate issued on June 8, 2006. See Battle v. State, Case No. 2D06-325 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). 524 U.S. 296,…