Opinion
No. 80655
03-05-2020
Jack Joseph BATTLE, Jr., Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest.
Jack Joseph Battle, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney
Jack Joseph Battle, Jr.
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to reverse and vacate petitioner’s sentence or reverse its denial of petitioner’s motion to correct or clarify his sentence and his presentence investigation report.
Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).
We reiterate that "[p]etitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.