Summary
holding that controlled substances may be identified through similar circumstantial evidence
Summary of this case from U.S. v. SchrockOpinion
No. 84-974.
March 4, 1985.
ORDERS
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 745 F. 2d 166.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Authority
U.S.
Mar 4, 1985
470 U.S. 1027 (1985)
Summaries of
Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Authority
U.S.
Mar 4, 1985
470 U.S. 1027 (1985)
holding that controlled substances may be identified through similar circumstantial evidence
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Schrockupholding similar regulatory scheme
Summary of this case from Canterbury Liquors Pantry v. SullivanCase details for
Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Authority
Case Details
Full title:BATTIPAGLIA ET AL. v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 4, 1985
Citations
470 U.S. 1027 (1985)
Citing Cases
Shurberg Broadcasting of Hartford v. F.C.C
As an applicant for a license outside of Hartford, he would be at a material disadvantage because of the…
Commonwealth v. MacDonaldCommonwealth v. Cantres, supra at 246-247, quoting United States v. Harrell, 737 F.2d 971, 978-979 (11th Cir.…