From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Batoon v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 27, 2011
429 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2011)

Summary

In Teague v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, the Seventh Circuit addressed this very issue, concluding that "a refusal to accommodate is a discrete act—not an ongoing omission—and therefore the continuing violation doctrine does not apply."

Summary of this case from Platt v. Chi. Transit Auth.

Opinion

No. 09-70765.

Submitted April 5, 2011.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed April 27, 2011.

Ravit Rae Halperin, Immigration Law Offices of R. Rae Halperin, Lancaster, CA, for Petitioners.

OIL, Carol Federighi, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Theo Nickerson, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel ICE, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency Nos. A071-581-985, A072-517-728.

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Ederlinda Tirona Batoon and Ailene Rose Batoon, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying their motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners' third and untimely motion to reopen, because the BIA considered the evidence submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (The BIA's denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed if it is "arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law."); In re Gutierrez-Lopez, 21 I. N. Dec. 479, 480 (BIA 1996) ("A case may not be administratively closed if opposed by either of the parties.").

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Batoon v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 27, 2011
429 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2011)

In Teague v. Northwestern Memorial Hospital, the Seventh Circuit addressed this very issue, concluding that "a refusal to accommodate is a discrete act—not an ongoing omission—and therefore the continuing violation doctrine does not apply."

Summary of this case from Platt v. Chi. Transit Auth.
Case details for

Batoon v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:Ederlinda Tirona BATOON; Ailene Rose Batoon, Petitioners, v. Eric H…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 27, 2011

Citations

429 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Platt v. Chi. Transit Auth.

(Dkt. 45 at 8) The continuing violation doctrine "concerns a claim based on an ongoing policy rather than…