From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. Schwarzenegger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 18, 2016
Case No. 1:14-cv-02085-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-02085-LJO-SAB Case No. 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB Case No. 1:15-cv-01063-LJO-SAB Case No. 1:15-cv-01369-LJO-SAB

02-18-2016

BATES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. MARLON ALTAMIRANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. ANDREW ALANIZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al, Defendants. JOSE APARICIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STAYING ACTIONS PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

The parties have stipulated to stay proceedings in these matters until the resolution of the appeals in Smith v. Schwarzenegger, appeal no. 15-17155, Hines v. Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and Jackson v. Brown, appeal no. 15-17076. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. All pending deadlines and hearings are VACATED in each of these cases; and

2. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading in these matters forty-five days after the mandate issues in Smith v. Schwarzenegger, appeal no. 15-17155.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18 , 2016

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bates v. Schwarzenegger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 18, 2016
Case No. 1:14-cv-02085-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Bates v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:BATES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 18, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-02085-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2016)