From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. Frakes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
May 21, 2019
8:18CV322 (D. Neb. May. 21, 2019)

Opinion

8:18CV322

05-21-2019

KEVIN J. BATES, Petitioner, v. SCOTT R. FRAKES, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is a habeas corpus case. After this case became ripe with the completion of the briefing process, today I discovered that the Honorable James E. Doyle, IV was the state trial judge who tried Mr. Bates' criminal case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), my impartiality might reasonably be questioned because of my recent discussions with Judge Doyle regarding a significant matter unrelated to this case.

When I left the practice of law in 1987, Judge Doyle was one of my law partners. That fact alone would not cause me to recuse myself. It is the recency and substance of my discussions with the judge that cause me to recuse myself. --------

IT IS ORDERED that the clerk's office shall randomly assign a new judge to this case and request a reassignment order from the Chief Judge. The chief pro se staff attorney will assist the judge to whom the case is reassigned if requested to do so.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2019.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bates v. Frakes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
May 21, 2019
8:18CV322 (D. Neb. May. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Bates v. Frakes

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN J. BATES, Petitioner, v. SCOTT R. FRAKES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: May 21, 2019

Citations

8:18CV322 (D. Neb. May. 21, 2019)