From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. Field Asset Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2023
2:23-cv-01813-DAD-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01813-DAD-KJN

09-13-2023

DAVID BATES, Plaintiff, v. FIELD ASSET SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND REMANDING ACTION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

(DOC. NOS. 5, 10)

DALE A. DROZD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 12, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation in which they agreed to: (1) dismiss plaintiff's first, second, and third causes of action, with prejudice, such that the only remaining claim in this action is plaintiff's fourth claim under the Unfair Competition Law, Business & Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. (“UCL”); and (2) remand this action to the Sacramento County Superior Court, where this action was originally filed. (Doc. No. 10.)

Accordingly:

1. Pursuant to the parties' stipulation (Doc. No. 10), plaintiff's first, second, and third claims are dismissed with prejudice;

2. This action, which proceeds only on plaintiff's UCL claim, is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court;

3. The pending motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is denied as having been rendered moot by this order; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bates v. Field Asset Servs.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 13, 2023
2:23-cv-01813-DAD-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Bates v. Field Asset Servs.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BATES, Plaintiff, v. FIELD ASSET SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 13, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01813-DAD-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2023)