Summary
concluding consideration for the cross-collateralization of a prior debt was given because additional credit was extended
Summary of this case from In re IDC Enters.Opinion
No. 36996-2-I.
April 28, 1997. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 93-2-23005-2, Robert S. Lasnik, J., entered June 14, 1995.
Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Cox and Ellington, JJ.