From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Basile v. Francino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1998
253 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

September 21, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the appeals by the defendants Jennifer Francino and New York Telephone Company are dismissed, as those defendants are not aggrieved by the order appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Although at the time of the incident the defendant Jennifer Francino was under the legal drinking age, and there was evidence that she had consumed alcohol, there was no evidence indicating that Francino was intoxicated. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiff's cause of action alleging that the respondent violated the Dram Shop Act ( see, General Obligations Law §§ 11-100 Gen. Oblig., 11-101 Gen. Oblig.).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Miller, J. P., Altman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Basile v. Francino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 21, 1998
253 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Basile v. Francino

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY BASILE, Appellant, v. JENNIFER FRANCINO et al., Appellants, and RAIL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 21, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 595

Citing Cases

Greco v. Begley

The appellant, Dublin Pub, Inc., made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in…

Gaige v. Kepler

d in concert with Garlans in planning the assault, or that she asked Garlans to commit the assault (see…