From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2023
2:23-cv-2176 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-2176 CKD P

11-01-2023

WILLIAM BARTON, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Barton v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cnty.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2023
2:23-cv-2176 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Barton v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BARTON, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-2176 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2023)