From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Apr 17, 2018
552 S.W.3d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105526

04-17-2018

Antoine D. BARTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jeannie M. Willibey, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105. ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.


ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: Jeannie M. Willibey, 920 Main Street, Suite 500, Kansas City, MO 64105.

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, P. O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J. and Sherri B. Sullivan and Kurt S. Odenwald, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antoine Barton appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Barton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Apr 17, 2018
552 S.W.3d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Barton v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antoine D. BARTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Apr 17, 2018

Citations

552 S.W.3d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)