From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Montero

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 15, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2018–05298 Docket No. O-2129-16

05-15-2019

In the Matter of Selena S. BARTON, etc., Respondent, v. Jimmy MONTERO, Jr., Appellant.

Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, NY, for appellant. Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for respondent. Carl D. Birman, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.


Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, NY, for appellant.

Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for respondent.

Carl D. Birman, White Plains, NY, attorney for the child.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. REINALDO E. RIVERA RUTH C. BALKIN JOSEPH J. MALTESE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDERIn a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the father appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Joseph A. Egitto, J.), dated April 9, 2018. The order of protection, upon granting the mother's motion to extend a prior order of protection of the same court dated October 18, 2016, directed the father, inter alia, to stay away from the parties' child until and including April 9, 2019.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order of protection dated April 9, 2018, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In this family offense proceeding, the Family Court issued a stay-away order of protection dated October 18, 2016, against the father, upon his consent and without any admission on his part, in favor of the parties' child. Subsequently, the mother moved to extend the order of protection dated October 18, 2016. On April 9, 2018, upon granting the mother's motion to extend the prior order of protection, the Family Court directed the father, inter alia, to stay away from the child until and including April 9, 2019. The father appeals from the order of protection dated April 9, 2018.The appeal must be dismissed, as the order of protection dated April 9, 2018, has expired by its terms and imposes no enduring consequences on the father (see Matter of Hannah T.R. [Soya R.], 145 A.D.3d 1012, 1013, 42 N.Y.S.3d 850 ; Matter of Baby Boy D. [Adanna C.], 127 A.D.3d 1079, 9 N.Y.S.3d 73 ; cf. Matter of Veronica P. v. Radcliff A., 24 N.Y.3d 668, 3 N.Y.S.3d 288, 26 N.E.3d 1143 ).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, BALKIN and MALTESE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barton v. Montero

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 15, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Barton v. Montero

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Selena S. Barton, etc., respondent, v. Jimmy Montero…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: May 15, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
98 N.Y.S.3d 490
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3783