From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Fillion

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 9, 2007
9:03-CV-1377 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 9, 2007)

Opinion

9:03-CV-1377.

October 9, 2007

CARL BARTON, Petitioner, Pro Se, 01-A-0037, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Coxsackie, NY.

STEVEN H. SCHWARTZ, ESQ., Asst. Attorney General, HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Respondent, Department of Law, The Capitol, Albany, NY.


DECISION and ORDER


Petitioner, Carl Barton, brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By Report-Recommendation dated August 6, 2007, the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the petition be denied and dismissed. There have been no objections made to the Report-Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED in all respects

The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barton v. Fillion

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 9, 2007
9:03-CV-1377 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 9, 2007)
Case details for

Barton v. Fillion

Case Details

Full title:CARL BARTON, Petitioner, v. GARY FILLION, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Oct 9, 2007

Citations

9:03-CV-1377 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 9, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Favro

Finally, petitioner must also use the proper procedural vehicle so that the state court may pass on the…

Trimm v. Sheahan

Finally, the petitioner must have used the proper procedural vehicle so that the state court may pass on the…