From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barton v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 12, 2010
Civil Action 2:09-cv-00741 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:09-cv-00741.

August 12, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's July 6, 2010 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Cheryl Barton is not disabled within the meaning of the Act.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendant.

This action is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Barton v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 12, 2010
Civil Action 2:09-cv-00741 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Barton v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Cheryl Barton, Plaintiff v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 12, 2010

Citations

Civil Action 2:09-cv-00741 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2010)