From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartle v. Meramec

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Oct 23, 2007
236 S.W.3d 124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. ED 89487.

October 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

Steve Wolf, Brown Crouppen, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Mary Anne Lindsey, Timothy M. Tierney, Evans Dixon, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J.



ORDER


Employer appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bartle v. Meramec

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Oct 23, 2007
236 S.W.3d 124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Bartle v. Meramec

Case Details

Full title:Jillian BARTLE, Claimant/Respondent, v. MERAMEC GROUP, INC.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Oct 23, 2007

Citations

236 S.W.3d 124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)