From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrus v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 18, 2017
Case No. 1:16-cv-00056-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cv-00056-JNP-EJF

10-18-2017

VAUGHN BARRUS, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On September 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse issued a Report and Recommendation that this court remand for further consideration the final agency decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the disability insurance benefits claimed by Vaughn Barrus. [Docket 27]. The Report and Recommendation advised the defendant, Nancy Berryhill, that a failure to object within 14 days of service could result in a waiver of objections upon review by this court. Ms. Berryhill did not file an objection.

Ms. Berryhill's failure to object waived any argument that the Report and Recommendation was in error. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court need not apply this waiver rule as a procedural bar if "the interests of justice so dictate." Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and its conclusion that the Commissioner's denial of benefits should be reversed and remanded for a rehearing. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ("The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing."). The court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous and finds that the interests of justice do not warrant deviation from the waiver rule. The court, therefore, ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [Docket 27] is ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. The court reverses the final agency decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the disability insurance benefits claimed by Mr. Barrus and remands for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation issued by Judge Furse.

SO ORDERED October 18, 2017.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

JILL N. PARRISH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barrus v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 18, 2017
Case No. 1:16-cv-00056-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Barrus v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:VAUGHN BARRUS, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Date published: Oct 18, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cv-00056-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2017)

Citing Cases

Tammy C. v. Saul

The ALJ specifically addressed physical limitations under section 1.04 and mental limitations under sections…

Pawlowski v. Berryhill

Although not specifically argued by plaintiff, some courts have noted that because there is not an objective…