From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barron v. French

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2021
3:20-CV-318-LPR-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-CV-318-LPR-BD

06-28-2021

DEURSLA LASHAY BARRON PLAINTIFF v. KYLE FRENCH DEFENDANT


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received a Recommendation to dismiss Ms. Barron's claims. Ms. Barron has not filed objections and the time for doing so has expired. After a careful and de novo review of the Recommendation and record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in its entirety.

Defendant French's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 15) be GRANTED, in part. Ms. Barron's claim that she was denied recreation time is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on her failure to exhaust her administrative remedies. Her claim that Defendant French denied her a shower on October 4, 2020, is dismissed for failure to state a federal claim for relief.

I'm not certain I agree with the Recommendation that Ms. Barron exhausted her administrative remedies on the shower denial. But that is of no moment because the Recommendation is clearly correct about the shower denial fails to state a viable claim.

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barron v. French

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2021
3:20-CV-318-LPR-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Barron v. French

Case Details

Full title:DEURSLA LASHAY BARRON PLAINTIFF v. KYLE FRENCH DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

3:20-CV-318-LPR-BD (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2021)