From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrios v. Bello

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 5, 2021
20 Civ. 5228 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 5228 (JPC)

11-05-2021

JENNIFER BARRIOS and LUZ MARY BARRIOS, Plaintiffs, v. MIGUEL BELLO and MAYALYN INES NEGRON, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge.

The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within thirty days of this Order in the event the settlement agreement is not completed and executed. Any such application filed after thirty days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Pursuant to 3.F of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barrios v. Bello

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 5, 2021
20 Civ. 5228 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Barrios v. Bello

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER BARRIOS and LUZ MARY BARRIOS, Plaintiffs, v. MIGUEL BELLO and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 5, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 5228 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2021)