From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barriga v. Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-01490-EPG-HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-01490-EPG-HC

10-31-2018

JOSE ANTONIO ROJAS BARRIGA, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN LUIS OBISPO, et al., Respondents.


ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

When a prisoner files a state habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging convictions or sentences are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Section 2241 further states that, rather than dismissing an improperly filed action, a district court, "in the exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice[,] may transfer" the habeas petition to another federal district for hearing and determination. Id.; see also 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court may transfer any civil action "to any other district or division where it might have been brought" for convenience of parties or "in the interest of justice").

Here, Petitioner's claims relate to his conviction and sentence from the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, and thus, the petition is preferably heard in the district of conviction, which is the Central District of California. Therefore, this action will be transferred.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 31 , 2018

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Barriga v. Superior Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-01490-EPG-HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Barriga v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANTONIO ROJAS BARRIGA, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-01490-EPG-HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2018)