From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Cioli

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG (PC)

01-11-2023

ANTHONY BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. A. CIOLI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS

Plaintiff Anthony Barrett is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action proceeding pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

On November 14, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 68). Defendants served the motion to dismiss on Plaintiff at 69617-061, 505 Wildindigo Run, Columbus, OH, 43081. (ECF No. 68-3).

On August 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address to 505 Wildindigo Run, Columbus, OH. (ECF No. 63).

Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days (Local Rule 230(1)), but did not do so. Local Rule 230(1) provides that the failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.”

“Failure to follow a district court's local rules is a proper ground for dismissal.” Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). Thus, a Court may dismiss an action for a plaintiff's failure to oppose a motion to dismiss, where the applicable local rule determines that failure to oppose a motion will be deemed a waiver of opposition. See Ghazali, 46 F.3d 52 (dismissal upheld even where plaintiff contended he did not receive motion to dismiss, where plaintiff had adequate notice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(b), and time to file opposition).

Despite Plaintiff's failure to follow Local Rule 230(1), the Court will give Plaintiff an additional twenty-one days to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. If Plaintiff fails to file his opposition within this period, the Court may deem the failure to oppose the motion to dismiss as a waiver of any opposition to that motion, and may recommend that the motion be granted on that basis. Alternatively, the Court may recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within twenty-one days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss; and
2. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court may deem the failure to oppose the motion to dismiss as a waiver of any opposition to that motion, and may recommend that the motion be granted on that basis. Alternatively, the Court may recommend that this action be dismissed because of Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Cioli

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Barrett v. Cioli

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. A. CIOLI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)