From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrera v. Decker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 7, 2020
20-CV-2755 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2020)

Summary

finding that the district court in the Southern District of New York lacked venue over habeas petitioner's claim that his health condition put him at imminent risk of contracting COVID-19, where the petitioner was incarcerated in New Jersey

Summary of this case from Dixon v. Brown

Opinion

20-CV-2755 (VEC)

04-07-2020

ASMED BARRERA, Petitioner, v. THOMAS DECKER, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement and CHAD WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Respondents.


ORDER

:

WHEREAS on April 2, 2020, Petitioner filed a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Dkt. 1);

WHEREAS Petitioner seeks immediate release from detention by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") on the grounds that he suffers from medical conditions putting him at imminent risk from COVID-19;

WHEREAS Petitioner is detained at the Bergen County Jail, New Jersey;

WHEREAS this Court has repeatedly held that the proper respondent in "core" habeas petitions—petitions where "the challenged custody is physical detention"—by immigration detainees is the immediate, physical custodian, i.e., the warden of the detention facility where the detainee is held, S.N.C. v. Sessions, 325 F. Supp. 3d 401, 406-07 (S.D.N.Y. 2018);

WHEREAS Petitioner has brought his claim "outside of 'the district of confinement,'" id. at 409 (quoting Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 443 (2004));

WHEREAS "venue is proper in these circumstances in the district in which the petitioner is physically detained," Binet v. Decker, No. 19-CV-7964, 2019 WL 6111275, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2019) (citing S.N.C., 325 F. Supp. 3d at 406-07);

WHEREAS this Court holds sua sponte that it lacks venue over Petitioner's core habeas claims, accord Order, Reyes v. Decker, 20-CV-2737 (Apr. 4, 2020) (ECF No. 4);

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to transfer this case to the District of New Jersey. Given the significant liberty interests at stake, the time-sensitivity of Petitioner's claims, and the risks to Petitioner's health posed by the rapid spread of COVID-19, the Court waives the seven-day waiting period customarily afforded under Local Civil Rule 83.1 and directs the Clerk to effectuate the transfer as soon as possible.

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 7, 2020

New York, NY

/s/ _________

VALERIE CAPRONI

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barrera v. Decker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 7, 2020
20-CV-2755 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2020)

finding that the district court in the Southern District of New York lacked venue over habeas petitioner's claim that his health condition put him at imminent risk of contracting COVID-19, where the petitioner was incarcerated in New Jersey

Summary of this case from Dixon v. Brown
Case details for

Barrera v. Decker

Case Details

Full title:ASMED BARRERA, Petitioner, v. THOMAS DECKER, in his official capacity as…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 7, 2020

Citations

20-CV-2755 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2020)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Washington

Because of the potential inconvenience and expense of moving Petitioner between his facility and the Court…

Vermett v. Brown

A habeas petition filed in the district court in the district of petitioner's confinement is the proper means…