Opinion
October, 1905.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Hiscock and Nash, JJ., who dissented on authority of Pratt, Hurst Co., Ltd., v. Tailer ( 99 App. Div. 236) ; Tompkins v. Continental National Bank (71 id. 330); Mutual Loan Assn. v. Lesser, No. 1 (81 id. 138); Ryan v. Duffy (54 id. 199).