From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrasso v. Kalinski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 25, 2013
3:12-CV-0471-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-CV-0471-RCJ-VPC

02-25-2013

FRANK BARRASSO, Plaintiff, v. MITKA KALINSKI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF #6) entered on December 3, 2012, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court enter an order dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby

ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF #6).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25TH day of February, 2013.

______________________

ROBERT C. JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Barrasso v. Kalinski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 25, 2013
3:12-CV-0471-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Barrasso v. Kalinski

Case Details

Full title:FRANK BARRASSO, Plaintiff, v. MITKA KALINSKI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

3:12-CV-0471-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2013)