Barr v. Beard

Full title: RONALD EVERT BARR, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 13, 2015

2:15-cv-1350 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2015)

Opinion

RONALD EVERT BARR, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY BEARD, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-1350 GGH P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 13, 2015

          ORDER

          GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Inyo County Superior Court. Inyo County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

         2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: