From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barquin v. Flores

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 20, 1984
459 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-995.

November 20, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Robert Kaye, J.

Joel Lumer, Jugo Ferradaz, Miami, for appellant.

Harvey D. Friedman, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


Florida courts have consistently held that gambling obligations, even if valid in the state in which they were undertaken, are unenforceable in Florida as contrary to law and public policy. See Dorado Beach Hotel Corp. v. Jernigan, 202 So.2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), appeal dismissed, 209 So.2d 669 (Fla. 1968); Young v. Sands, Inc., 122 So.2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); § 849.26, Fla. Stat. (1977). Thus, we find no error in the trial court's dismissal of Barquin's complaint, even though the gambling proceeds he sought to recover derived from a Puerto Rican lottery ticket lawfully purchased by a Puerto Rican resident in Puerto Rico.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Barquin v. Flores

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 20, 1984
459 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Barquin v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:JUAN BARQUIN, APPELLANT, v. ORESTES FLORES AND JOSE FLORES, APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 20, 1984

Citations

459 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

MGM Grand Hotel, Inc. v. Siegel

All promises, agreements, notes, bills, bonds or other contracts, mortgages or other securities, when the…

Manshum v. Carnival Cruise Lines

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Froug v. Carnival Leisure Indus., Ltd., 627 So.2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Barquin v.…