From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Wolfe

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 4, 2009
CASE NO. 2:07-cv-667 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-667.

April 4, 2009


OPINION AND ORDER


On March 17, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Counsel has been appointed for petitioner Barnett; and the Magistrate Judge will hold an evidentiary hearing on petitioner's claims that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and his right to appeal when his attorney failed to file a timely appeal after being requested to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barnett v. Wolfe

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 4, 2009
CASE NO. 2:07-cv-667 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Barnett v. Wolfe

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BARNETT, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY WOLFE, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 4, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 2:07-cv-667 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2009)