From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 14, 2011
72 So. 3d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 5D10–3606.

2011-10-14

Raymond Glenn BARNETT, Appellant,v.STATE of Florida, Appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Bob Leblanc, Judge.James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Megan Saillant, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Barnett appeals from a restitution order, contending that the trial court erred by applying the wrong measure of damages in determining the amount of restitution to be paid for the victim's damaged and destroyed property. We agree. Absent special circumstances, the correct measure of damages is fair market value, not replacement value. See J.D.H. v. State, 931 So.2d 241 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Walters v. State, 888 So.2d 150 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Ibrahim v. State, 866 So.2d 749 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); J.F.H. v. State, 849 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW RESTITUTION HEARING.

MONACO, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barnett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 14, 2011
72 So. 3d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Barnett v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND GLENN BARNETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

72 So. 3d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)