From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnett v. Bacardi

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 10, 1981
394 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 80-2384.

March 10, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Joseph J. Gerstein, J.

Sheldon Yavitz, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C.J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.


The trial court granted a temporary injunction but did not require the posting of a bond [there was no attempt to come within the exception to this rule. See: Santona-Nervia Corporation v. Publix Market, Inc., 146 So.2d 394 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Hoffman v. White, 235 So.2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b).] Upon a motion to dissolve, the trial court refused to dissolve the temporary injunction. This appeal ensued. We reverse.

Except in limited circumstances, which are not present in this case, a temporary injunction may not be issued without the posting of a bond. La Gran Familia, Inc. v. Cuba Pharmacy, Inc., 349 So.2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Crow, Pope Carter, Inc. v. James, 349 So.2d 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Therefore, the order refusing to dissolve the temporary injunction be and the same is hereby reversed and the matter remanded to the trial court with directions to grant the motion to dissolve and terminate the temporary injunction.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Barnett v. Bacardi

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 10, 1981
394 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Barnett v. Bacardi

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL F. BARNETT, APPELLANT, v. ADRIANA C. BACARDI, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 10, 1981

Citations

394 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

AOT, Inc. v. Hampshire Management Co.

"No temporary injunction shall be entered unless a bond is given by the movant in an amount the court deems…