From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 23, 2004
875 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-1516.

Opinion filed June 23, 2004.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 01-15208.

Andrew F. Rier, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before RAMIREZ and SHEPHERD, JJ., and BARKDULL, THOMAS H., JR., Senior Judge.


Michael Barnes appeals from a conviction for attempted first degree murder with a deadly weapon. The Record reflects that on twenty-one separate occasions during cross-examination and closing argument, the trial court interrupted defense counsel with instructions such as "move on," "next question," "let's go," or "counsel sit down." Barnes contends that these limitations prevented his counsel from addressing the credibility of the State's key witness. We agree and reverse on the authority of Goodrich v. State, 854 So.2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), which is directly on point.

In Goodrich, this Court reversed a defendant's convictions after a trial in which this same trial judge instructed defense counsel on fourteen separate occasions "to either `move on,' `move along,' `let's move,' or `let's go.'" Id. at 664. As in that case,

In fairness to the trial court, it should be noted that the opinion in Goodrich was not released until shortly after the conclusion of the trial in the instant case.

the credibility . . . of the [State's key witness was] central to the Defendant's theory of the case. By preventing counsel from arguing those issues fully, the trial court denied the Defendant the right to effective assistance of counsel and certainly hindered the defense counsel's `last clear chance' to persuade the jury that there may be reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt.

Id. at 665.

We find no merit to any of the other arguments raised. Accordingly, Barnes' conviction and sentence are reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.


Summaries of

Barnes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 23, 2004
875 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Barnes v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BARNES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 23, 2004

Citations

875 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)