Barnes v. Mavity

Full title: Gary Barnes, Plaintiff, v. William Mavity, and Insurance Carrier…

Court: United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 3, 2010

Civ. No. 10-3950 (PAM/JJK) (D. Minn. Nov. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-3950 (PAM/JJK).

November 3, 2010

ORDER

PAUL MAGNUSON, District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated September 20, 2010. The Court must conduct a de novo review of all portions of a Magistrate Judge's R R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); D. Minn. L. R. 72.2(b). No objections have been filed in the time period permitted. Thus, this Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions in the R R (Docket No. 4).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is DENIED; and

2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3), this action is summarily DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: November 3, 2010