From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2014
Case No. CV 11-6340 CJC (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-6340 CJC (JCG)

10-06-2014

KEENA F. BARNES, Petitioner, v. SUSAN L. HUBBARD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;



2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and



3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: October 6, 2014

/s/_________

HON. CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Barnes v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2014
Case No. CV 11-6340 CJC (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Barnes v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:KEENA F. BARNES, Petitioner, v. SUSAN L. HUBBARD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 11-6340 CJC (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wren v. Ndoh

28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. 216, 219 (2011). In similar cases, district courts have…