From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnard v. O'Connell

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Sep 29, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-340 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-340.

September 29, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.


Summaries of

Barnard v. O'Connell

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Sep 29, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-340 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Barnard v. O'Connell

Case Details

Full title:Daniel P. Barnard, Plaintiff, v. Timothy O'Connell, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Sep 29, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-340 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Bowman v. Bachman

All of the acts alleged against the Defendant were performed in his judicial capacity in adjudicating the…