From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barkwell v. Rich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Aug 24, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1019 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1019

08-24-2012

CHAD BARKWELL v. STEVEN RICH, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Chad Barkwell, an inmate formerly confined at the Stiles Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants Sharon Allen, Vivian L. Davis, Vera A. Breaux, and Steven Rich.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends defendants motion for summary judgment be granted and plaintiff's civil rights action be dismissed.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

______________________

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barkwell v. Rich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Aug 24, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1019 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Barkwell v. Rich

Case Details

Full title:CHAD BARKWELL v. STEVEN RICH, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Aug 24, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-1019 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 24, 2012)

Citing Cases

Eustice v. Tex. a & M Univ.

See also, e.g., Slocum v. Livington, CIV.A. H-11-486, 2012 WL 2088953, at *14 n.11 (S.D. Tex. June 8, 2012)…