From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barkman v. Akron

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 12, 1963
191 N.E.2d 540 (Ohio 1963)

Opinion

No. 37749

Decided June 12, 1963.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Zoning — Municipal ordinance — Constitutionality — Reasonableness of application.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County.

Messrs. O'Neill Smith, for appellant.

Mr. James V. Barbuto, director of law, and Mr. Sal Germano, for appellees.


The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barkman v. Akron

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 12, 1963
191 N.E.2d 540 (Ohio 1963)
Case details for

Barkman v. Akron

Case Details

Full title:BARKMAN, APPELLANT v. CITY OF AKRON ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 12, 1963

Citations

191 N.E.2d 540 (Ohio 1963)
191 N.E.2d 540