Barket v. Clarke

Full title: STEVE BARKET, Plaintiff, v. TOM CLARK aka TOM CLARKE, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Case No. 2:12-cv-00393-JCM-GWF (D. Nev. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-00393-JCM-GWF

03-12-2013

STEVE BARKET, Plaintiff, v. TOM CLARK aka TOM CLARKE, Defendant.

GEORGE FOLEY

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Stipulation and Order for Limited Extension of Discovery (#25) filed January 11, 2013, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than March 7, 2013. There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that

1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than March 22, 2013. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

. . . . . . . . . . . .

2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.

___________

GEORGE FOLEY, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge