From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 10, 1937
109 S.W.2d 1062 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)

Opinion

No. 19189.

Delivered November 10, 1937.

1. — Forgery — Affirmance.

Conviction for forgery was affirmed where the indictment appeared regular, and the record was before Court of Criminal Appeals without statement of facts or bills of exception.

2. — New Trial — Evidence.

In absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, the Court of Criminal Appeals is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

Appeal from Criminal District Court of Tarrant County. Hon. Willis M. McGregor, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for forgery; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Clark Wills, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is forgery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

Finding no error justifying a reversal, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Barker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 10, 1937
109 S.W.2d 1062 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
Case details for

Barker v. State

Case Details

Full title:WARREN C. BARKER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 10, 1937

Citations

109 S.W.2d 1062 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
109 S.W.2d 1062